Show simple item record

2022-12-23Zeitschriftenartikel
Socioeconomic differences in the reduction of face-to-face contacts in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany
dc.contributor.authorWaldhauer, Julia
dc.contributor.authorBeese, Florian
dc.contributor.authorWachtler, Banjamin
dc.contributor.authorHaller, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorKoschollek, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorPförtner, Timo-Kolja
dc.contributor.authorHoebel, Jens
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-29T14:12:24Z
dc.date.available2024-08-29T14:12:24Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-23none
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s12889-022-14811-4
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.rki.de/176904/12041
dc.description.abstractBackground The COVID-19 pandemic has led to physical distancing measures to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Evidence on contact dynamics in different socioeconomic groups is still sparse. This study aimed to investigate the association of socioeconomic status with private and professional contact reductions in the first COVID-19 wave in Germany. Methods Data from two especially affected municipalities were derived from the population-based cross-sectional seroepidemiological CORONA-MONITORING lokal study (data collection May–July 2020). The study sample (n = 3,637) was restricted to working age (18–67 years). We calculated the association of educational and occupational status (low, medium, high) with self-reported private and professional contact reductions with respect to former contact levels in the first wave of the pandemic. Multivariate Poisson regressions were performed to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) adjusted for municipality, age, gender, country of birth, household size, contact levels before physical distancing measures, own infection status, contact to SARS-CoV-2 infected people and working remotely. Results The analyses showed significant differences in the initial level of private and professional contacts by educational and occupational status. Less private contact reductions with lower educational status (PR low vs. high = 0,79 [CI = 0.68–0.91], p = 0.002; PR medium vs. high = 0,93 [CI = 0.89–0.97], p = 0.001) and less professional contact reductions with lower educational status (PR low vs. high = 0,87 [CI = 0.70–1.07], p = 0.179; PR medium vs. high = 0,89 [CI = 0.83–0.95], p = 0.001) and lower occupational status (PR low vs. high = 0,62 [CI = 0.55–0.71], p < 0.001; PR medium vs. high = 0,82 [CI = 0.77–0.88], p < 0.001) were observed. Conclusions Our results indicate disadvantages for groups with lower socioeconomic status in private and professional contact reductions in the first wave of the pandemic. This may be associated with the higher risk of infection among individuals in lower socioeconomic groups. Preventive measures that a) adequately explain the importance of contact restrictions with respect to varying living and working conditions and b) facilitate the implementation of these reductions especially in the occupational setting seem necessary to better protect structurally disadvantaged groups during epidemics.eng
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherRobert Koch-Institut
dc.rights(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschlandger
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/
dc.subjectCOVID-19eng
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2eng
dc.subjecteducational statuseng
dc.subjectoccupational statuseng
dc.subjectcontact reductioneng
dc.subjectsocial epidemiologyeng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin und Gesundheitnone
dc.titleSocioeconomic differences in the reduction of face-to-face contacts in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germanynone
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0257-176904/12041-7
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.container-titleBMC Public Healthnone
local.edoc.container-issn1471-2458none
local.edoc.pages11none
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-urlhttps://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/none
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameSpringer Naturenone
local.edoc.container-volume22none
local.edoc.container-reportyear2022none
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewednone

Show simple item record