Show simple item record

2022-03-04Zeitschriftenartikel
Methodological guidance for rapid reviews in healthcare: A scoping review
dc.contributor.authorSpeckemeier, Christian
dc.contributor.authorNiemann, Anja
dc.contributor.authorWasem, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorBuchberger, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorNeusser, Silke
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-02T15:23:34Z
dc.date.available2024-09-02T15:23:34Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-04none
dc.identifier.other10.1002/jrsm.1555
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.rki.de/176904/12068
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present work was to identify published methodological guidance for rapid reviews (RRs) and to analyze the recommendations with regard to time-saving measures. A literature search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE in November 2020. In addition, a search based on Google Scholar and websites of governmental and non-governmental organizations was conducted. Literature screening was carried out by two researchers independently. A total of 34 publications were included. These describe 38 distinct RR types. The timeframe to complete the identified RR types ranges from 24 h to 6 months (mean time 2.2 months). For most RR types a specific research question (n = 21) and a prioritizing search (n = 25; preference for e.g., systematic reviews and meta-analyses) is employed. Different approaches such as reduced personnel in literature screening (n = 21) and data extraction (n = 21) are recommended. The majority of RR types include a bias assessment (n = 28) and suggest a narrative report focusing on safety and efficacy. The included RR types are heterogeneous in terms of completion time, considered domains and strategies to alter the standard systematic review methods. A rationale for the recommended shortcuts is rarely presented.eng
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherRobert Koch-Institut
dc.rights(CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 DE) Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitung 3.0 Deutschlandger
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/de/
dc.subjectevidence synthesiseng
dc.subjectguidelineeng
dc.subjectmethodologyeng
dc.subjectrapid revieweng
dc.subjectrecommendationseng
dc.subjectscoping revieweng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin und Gesundheitnone
dc.titleMethodological guidance for rapid reviews in healthcare: A scoping reviewnone
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0257-176904/12068-9
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.container-titleResearch Synthesis Methodsnone
local.edoc.container-issn1759-2887none
local.edoc.pages11none
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17592887none
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameJohn Wiley & Sons, Incnone
local.edoc.container-volume13none
local.edoc.container-issue4none
local.edoc.container-reportyear2022none
local.edoc.container-firstpage394none
local.edoc.container-lastpage404none
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewednone

Show simple item record