Zur Kurzanzeige

2023-07-14Zeitschriftenartikel
Evaluation of Disinfectant Efficacy against Biofilm-Residing Wild-Type Salmonella from the Porcine Industry
dc.contributor.authorOsland, Ane M.
dc.contributor.authorOastler, Claire
dc.contributor.authorKonrat, Katharina
dc.contributor.authorNesse, Live L.
dc.contributor.authorBrook, Emma
dc.contributor.authorRichter, Anja M.
dc.contributor.authorGosling, Rebecca J.
dc.contributor.authorArvand, Mardjan
dc.contributor.authorVestby, Lene K.
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-12T11:12:30Z
dc.date.available2025-02-12T11:12:30Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-14none
dc.identifier.other10.3390/antibiotics12071189
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.rki.de/176904/12395
dc.description.abstractSalmonella enterica is a causative pathogen of Salmonellosis, a zoonosis causing global disease and financial losses every year. Pigs may be carriers of Salmonella and contribute to the spread to humans and food products. Salmonella may persist as biofilms. Biofilms are bacterial aggregates embedded in a self-produced matrix and are known to withstand disinfectants. We studied the effect of glutaraldehyde and peracetic acid, two active substances frequently used in disinfectant formulations in the pig industry, on representative biofilm-residing wild-type Salmonella collected from pig housings in the United Kingdom (UK). We screened biofilm production of strains using the microtiter plate (MTP) assay and Congo Red Coomassie Blue (CRCB) agar method. Previously published stainless-steel coupon (SSCA), polyvinylchloride coupon (PCA), and glass bead (GBA) assays were used for disinfection studies. The mean reduction in the tested wild-type strains met the criterion of ≥4 log10 CFU at a disinfectant concentration of 0.05% with SSCA and GBA, and 0.005% with PCA for peracetic acid, along with 0.5% for glutaraldehyde with all three assays on the mean. At these concentrations, both tested disinfectants are suitable for disinfection of pig housings against Salmonella. When evaluating the efficacy of disinfectants, biofilms should be included, as higher disinfectant concentrations are necessary compared to planktonic bacteria.eng
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherRobert Koch-Institut
dc.rights(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschlandger
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/
dc.subjectbiofilmeng
dc.subjectSalmonellaeng
dc.subjectdisinfectioneng
dc.subjectpig industryeng
dc.subjectglutaraldehydeeng
dc.subjectperacetic acideng
dc.subjectbiocideeng
dc.subjectzoonosiseng
dc.subjectfood safetyeng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin und Gesundheitnone
dc.titleEvaluation of Disinfectant Efficacy against Biofilm-Residing Wild-Type Salmonella from the Porcine Industrynone
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0257-176904/12395-1
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.container-titleAntibioticsnone
local.edoc.container-issn2079-6382none
local.edoc.pages15none
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-urlhttps://www.mdpi.com/journal/antibioticsnone
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameMDPInone
local.edoc.container-volume12none
local.edoc.container-issue7none
local.edoc.container-reportyear2023none
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewednone

Zur Kurzanzeige