Zur Kurzanzeige

2023-06-14Zeitschriftenartikel
Zoonotic sources and the spread of antimicrobial resistance from the perspective of low and middle-income countries
dc.contributor.authorOlaru, Ioana D.
dc.contributor.authorWalther, Birgit
dc.contributor.authorSchaumburg, Frieder
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-26T11:38:35Z
dc.date.available2025-08-26T11:38:35Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-14none
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s40249-023-01113-z
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.rki.de/176904/12919
dc.description.abstractBackground: Antimicrobial resistance is an increasing challenge in low and middle-income countries as it is widespread in these countries and is linked to an increased mortality. Apart from human and environmental factors, animal-related drivers of antimicrobial resistance in low- and middle-income countries have special features that differ from high-income countries. The aim of this narrative review is to address the zoonotic sources and the spread of antimicrobial resistance from the perspective of low- and middle-income countries. Main body: Contamination with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli is highest in poultry (Africa: 8.9–60%, Asia: 53–93%) and there is a risk to import ESBL-producing E. coli through poultry meat in Africa. In aquacultures, the proportion of ESBL-producers among E. coli can be high (27%) but the overall low quality of published studies limit the general conclusion on the impact of aquacultures on human health. ESBL-producing E. coli colonization of wildlife is 1–9% in bats or 2.5–63% birds. Since most of them are migratory animals, they can disperse antimicrobial resistant bacteria over large distances. So-called ‘filth flies’ are a relevant vector not only of enteric pathogens but also of antimicrobial resistant bacteria in settings where sanitary systems are poor. In Africa, up to 72.5% of ‘filth flies’ are colonized with ESBL-producing E. coli, mostly conferred by CTX-M (24.4–100%). While methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus plays a minor role in livestock in Africa, it is frequently found in South America in poultry (27%) or pork (37.5–56.5%) but less common in Asia (poultry: 3%, pork: 1–16%). Conclusions: Interventions to contain the spread of AMR should be tailored to the needs of low- and middle-income countries. These comprise capacity building of diagnostic facilities, surveillance, infection prevention and control in small-scale farming.eng
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherRobert Koch-Institut
dc.rights(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschlandger
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/
dc.subjectAntimicrobial resistanceeng
dc.subjectExtended-spectrum Beta-lactamaseeng
dc.subjectMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureuseng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin und Gesundheitnone
dc.titleZoonotic sources and the spread of antimicrobial resistance from the perspective of low and middle-income countriesnone
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0257-176904/12919-9
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.container-titleInfectious Diseases of Povertynone
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameSpringer Naturenone
local.edoc.container-reportyear2023none
local.edoc.container-firstpage1none
local.edoc.container-lastpage15none
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewednone

Zur Kurzanzeige