Show simple item record

2023-01-05Zeitschriftenartikel
Understanding COVID-19 reporting behaviour to support political decision-making: a retrospective cross-sectional study of COVID-19 data reported to WHO
dc.contributor.authorAbbood, Auss
dc.contributor.authorUllrich, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorDenkel, Luisa A.
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-12T13:23:33Z
dc.date.available2025-11-12T13:23:33Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-05none
dc.identifier.other10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061717
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.rki.de/176904/13070
dc.description.abstractObjective: Daily COVID-19 data reported by WHO may provide the basis for political ad hoc decisions including travel restrictions. Data reported by countries, however, are heterogeneous and metrics to evaluate its quality are scarce. In this work, we analysed COVID-19 case counts provided by WHO and developed tools to evaluate country-specific reporting behaviours. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, COVID-19 data reported daily to WHO from 3 January 2020 until 14 June 2021 were analysed. We proposed the concepts of binary reporting rate and relative reporting behaviour and performed descriptive analyses for all countries with these metrics. We developed a score to evaluate the consistency of incidence and binary reporting rates. Further, we performed spectral clustering of the binary reporting rate and relative reporting behaviour to identify salient patterns in these metrics. Results: Our final analysis included 222 countries and regions. Reporting scores varied between −0.17, indicating discrepancies between incidence and binary reporting rate, and 1.0 suggesting high consistency of these two metrics. Median reporting score for all countries was 0.71 (IQR 0.55–0.87). Descriptive analyses of the binary reporting rate and relative reporting behaviour showed constant reporting with a slight ‘weekend effect’ for most countries, while spectral clustering demonstrated that some countries had even more complex reporting patterns. Conclusion: The majority of countries reported COVID-19 cases when they did have cases to report. The identification of a slight ‘weekend effect’ suggests that COVID-19 case counts reported in the middle of the week may represent the best data basis for political ad hoc decisions. A few countries, however, showed unusual or highly irregular reporting that might require more careful interpretation. Our score system and cluster analyses might be applied by epidemiologists advising policy makers to consider country-specific reporting behaviours in political ad hoc decisions.eng
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherRobert Koch-Institut
dc.rights(CC BY-SA 3.0 DE) Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschlandger
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/
dc.subjectCOVID-19eng
dc.subjectepidemiologyeng
dc.subjectpublic healtheng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin und Gesundheitnone
dc.titleUnderstanding COVID-19 reporting behaviour to support political decision-making: a retrospective cross-sectional study of COVID-19 data reported to WHOnone
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0257-176904/13070-0
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.container-titleBMJ opennone
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameBMJ Publishing Group Ltd.none
local.edoc.container-reportyear2023none
local.edoc.container-firstpage1none
local.edoc.container-lastpage10none

Show simple item record