Zur Kurzanzeige

2023-07-29Zeitschriftenartikel
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care in Germany: rapid review
dc.contributor.authorDe Santis, Karina Karolina
dc.contributor.authorHelmer, Stefanie
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorKraywinkel, Klaus
dc.contributor.authorImhoff, Maren
dc.contributor.authorMüller-Eberstein, Roxana
dc.contributor.authorKirstein, Mathia
dc.contributor.authorQuatmann, Anna
dc.contributor.authorSimke, Julia
dc.contributor.authorStiens, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorChristianson, Lara
dc.contributor.authorZeeb, Hajo
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T08:18:48Z
dc.date.available2026-02-06T08:18:48Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-29none
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s00432-023-05063-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.rki.de/176904/13246
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The COVID-19 pandemic affected medical care for chronic diseases. This study aimed to systematically assess the pandemic impact on oncological care in Germany using a rapid review. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, study and preprint registries and study bibliographies were searched for studies published between 2020 and 2 November 2022. Inclusion was based on the PCC framework: population (cancer), concept (oncological care) and context (COVID-19 pandemic in Germany). Studies were selected after title/abstract and full-text screening by two authors. Extracted data were synthesized using descriptive statistics or narratively. Risk of bias was assessed and summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: Overall, 77 records (59 peer-reviewed studies and 18 reports) with administrative, cancer registry and survey data were included. Disruptions in oncological care were reported and varied according to pandemic-related factors (e.g., pandemic stage) and other (non-pandemic) factors (e.g., care details). During higher restriction periods fewer consultations and non-urgent surgeries, and delayed diagnosis and screening were consistently reported. Heterogeneous results were reported for treatment types other than surgery (e.g., psychosocial care) and aftercare, while ongoing care remained mostly unchanged. The risk of bias was on average moderate. Conclusions: Disruptions in oncological care were reported during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Such disruptions probably depended on factors that were insufficiently controlled for in statistical analyses and evidence quality was on average only moderate. Research focus on patient outcomes (e.g., longer term consequences of disruptions) and pandemic management by healthcare systems is potentially relevant for future pandemics or health emergencies.eng
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherRobert Koch-Institut
dc.rights(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschlandger
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/
dc.subjectCancereng
dc.subjectNeoplasmseng
dc.subjectOncological careeng
dc.subjectOncology serviceeng
dc.subjectCOVID-19eng
dc.subjectGermanyeng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin und Gesundheitnone
dc.titleImpact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care in Germany: rapid reviewnone
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0257-176904/13246-4
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.container-titleJournal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncologynone
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameSpringer Naturenone
local.edoc.container-reportyear2023none
local.edoc.container-firstpage14329none
local.edoc.container-lastpage14340none
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewednone

Zur Kurzanzeige