Zur Kurzanzeige

2024-09-18Zeitschriftenartikel
Evaluating national infection prevention and control minimum requirements: evidence from global cross-sectional surveys, 2017–22
dc.contributor.authorTartari, Ermira
dc.contributor.authorTomczyk, Sara
dc.contributor.authorTwyman, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorCoutinho Rehse, Ana Paula
dc.contributor.authorGomaa, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorTalaat, Maha
dc.contributor.authorShah, Aparna Singh
dc.contributor.authorSobel, Howard
dc.contributor.authorToledo, Joao Paulo
dc.contributor.authorAllegranzi, Benedetta
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-17T12:03:15Z
dc.date.available2026-02-17T12:03:15Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-18none
dc.identifier.other10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00277-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.rki.de/176904/13369
dc.description.abstractBackground: WHO infection prevention and control (IPC) minimum requirements provide standards to reduce the risk of infection during health-care delivery. We aimed to investigate the global implementation of these requirements at national levels and the progress of doing so across 2021–22 compared with 2017–18 to identify future directions for interventions. Methods: National IPC focal points were invited to complete an online survey measuring IPC minimum requirements from July 19, 2021, to Jan 31, 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of countries meeting IPC minimum requirements. Country characteristics associated with this outcome were assessed with beta regression. Subset analyses were conducted to compare the 2021–22 indicators with a WHO IPC survey conducted in 2017–18 and to assess the correlation of the proportion of IPC minimum requirements met with the results of other WHO metrics. Findings: 106 countries (ie, 13 low income, 27 lower-middle income, 33 upper-middle income, and 33 high income) participated in the survey (56% response rate). Four (4%) of 106 met all IPC minimum requirements. The highest scoring IPC core component was multimodal improvement strategies and the lowest was IPC education and training. The odds of meeting IPC minimum requirements was higher among high-income countries compared with low-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 2·7, 95% CI 1·3–5·8; p=0·020). Compared with the 2017–18 survey, there was a significant increase in the proportion of countries reporting an active national IPC programme (65% to 82%, p=0·037) and a dedicated budget (26% to 44%, p=0·037). Evaluation of the IPC minimum requirements compared with other survey instruments revealed a low positive correlation. Interpretation: To build resilient health systems capable of withstanding future health threats, urgently scaling up adherence to WHO IPC minimum requirements is essential. Funding: WHO. Translations: For the French and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.eng
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherRobert Koch-Institut
dc.rights(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschlandger
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studieseng
dc.subjectGlobal Healtheng
dc.subjectHumanseng
dc.subjectInfection Control / methodseng
dc.subjectInfection Control / standardseng
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaireseng
dc.subjectWorld Health Organizationeng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin und Gesundheitnone
dc.titleEvaluating national infection prevention and control minimum requirements: evidence from global cross-sectional surveys, 2017–22none
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0257-176904/13369-9
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.container-titleThe Lancet Global Healthnone
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameElsevier B.V.none
local.edoc.container-reportyear2024none
local.edoc.container-firstpagee1620none
local.edoc.container-lastpagee1628none
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewednone

Zur Kurzanzeige