Zur Kurzanzeige

2024-05-10Zeitschriftenartikel
Multi-Input data ASsembly for joint Analysis (MIASA): A framework for the joint analysis of disjoint sets of variables
dc.contributor.authorRaharinirina, Nomenjanahary Alexia
dc.contributor.authorSunkara, Vikram
dc.contributor.authorvon Kleist, Max
dc.contributor.authorFackeldey, Konstantin
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Marcus
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-25T11:45:36Z
dc.date.available2026-02-25T11:45:36Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-10none
dc.identifier.other10.1371/journal.pone.0302425
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.rki.de/176904/13417
dc.description.abstractThe joint analysis of two datasets and that describe the same phenomena (e.g. the cellular state), but measure disjoint sets of variables (e.g. mRNA vs. protein levels) is currently challenging. Traditional methods typically analyze single interaction patterns such as variance or covariance. However, problem-tailored external knowledge may contain multiple different information about the interaction between the measured variables. We introduce MIASA, a holistic framework for the joint analysis of multiple different variables. It consists of assembling multiple different information such as similarity vs. association, expressed in terms of interaction-scores or distances, for subsequent clustering/classification. In addition, our framework includes a novel qualitative Euclidean embedding method (qEE-Transition) which enables using Euclidean-distance/vector-based clustering/classification methods on datasets that have a non-Euclidean-based interaction structure. As an alternative to conventional optimization-based multidimensional scaling methods which are prone to uncertainties, our qEE-Transition generates a new vector representation for each element of the dataset union in a common Euclidean space while strictly preserving the original ordering of the assembled interaction-distances. To demonstrate our work, we applied the framework to three types of simulated datasets: samples from families of distributions, samples from correlated random variables, and time-courses of statistical moments for three different types of stochastic two-gene interaction models. We then compared different clustering methods with vs. without the qEE-Transition. For all examples, we found that the qEE-Transition followed by Ward clustering had superior performance compared to non-agglomerative clustering methods but had a varied performance against ultrametric-based agglomerative methods. We also tested the qEE-Transition followed by supervised and unsupervised machine learning methods and found promising results, however, more work is needed for optimal parametrization of these methods. As a future perspective, our framework points to the importance of more developments and validation of distance-distribution models aiming to capture multiple-complex interactions between different variables.eng
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherRobert Koch-Institut
dc.rights(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschlandger
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin und Gesundheitnone
dc.titleMulti-Input data ASsembly for joint Analysis (MIASA): A framework for the joint analysis of disjoint sets of variablesnone
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0257-176904/13417-4
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.container-titlePLOS Onenone
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-publisher-namePLOSnone
local.edoc.container-reportyear2024none
local.edoc.container-firstpage1none
local.edoc.container-lastpage26none
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewednone

Zur Kurzanzeige