Zur Kurzanzeige

2024-04-16Zeitschriftenartikel
Chaos and COSMOS—Considerations on QSM methods with multiple and single orientations and effects from local anisotropy
dc.contributor.authorGkotsoulias, Dimitrios G.
dc.contributor.authorJäger, Carsten
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Roland
dc.contributor.authorGräßle, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorOlofsson, Karin M.
dc.contributor.authorMøller, Torsten
dc.contributor.authorUnwin, Steve
dc.contributor.authorCrockford, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorWittig, Roman M.
dc.contributor.authorBilgic, Berkin
dc.contributor.authorMöller, Harald E.
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-12T09:34:27Z
dc.date.available2026-03-12T09:34:27Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-16none
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.mri.2024.04.020
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.rki.de/176904/13526
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Field-to-susceptibility inversion in quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is ill-posed and needs numerical stabilization through either regularization or oversampling by acquiring data at three or more object orientations. Calculation Of Susceptibility through Multiple Orientations Sampling (COSMOS) is an established oversampling approach and regarded as QSM gold standard. It achieves a well-conditioned inverse problem, requiring rotations by 0°, 60° and 120° in the -plane. However, this is impractical in vivo, where head rotations are typically restricted to a range of ±25°. Non-ideal sampling degrades the conditioning with residual streaking artifacts whose mitigation needs further regularization. Moreover, susceptibility anisotropy in white matter is not considered in the COSMOS model, which may introduce additional bias. The current work presents a thorough investigation of these effects in primate brain. Methods: Gradient-recalled echo (GRE) data of an entire fixed chimpanzee brain were acquired at 7 T (350 μm resolution, 10 orientations) including ideal COSMOS sampling and realistic rotations in vivo. Comparisons of the results included ideal COSMOS, in-vivo feasible acquisitions with 3–8 orientations and single-orientation iLSQR QSM. Results: In-vivo feasible and optimal COSMOS yielded high-quality susceptibility maps with increased SNR resulting from averaging multiple acquisitions. COSMOS reconstructions from non-ideal rotations about a single axis required additional L2-regularization to mitigate residual streaking artifacts. Conclusion: In view of unconsidered anisotropy effects, added complexity of the reconstruction, and the general challenge of multi-orientation acquisitions, advantages of sub-optimal COSMOS schemes over regularized single-orientation QSM appear limited in in-vivo settings.eng
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherRobert Koch-Institut
dc.rights(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschlandger
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/
dc.subjectAnisotropic magnetic susceptibilityeng
dc.subjectCOSMOSeng
dc.subjectGradient-recalled echoeng
dc.subjectQuantitative susceptibility mappingeng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin und Gesundheitnone
dc.titleChaos and COSMOS—Considerations on QSM methods with multiple and single orientations and effects from local anisotropynone
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0257-176904/13526-8
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.container-titleMagnetic Resonance Imagingnone
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameElsevier B.V.none
local.edoc.container-reportyear2024none
local.edoc.container-firstpage104none
local.edoc.container-lastpage111none
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewednone

Zur Kurzanzeige