Zur Kurzanzeige

2005-02-01Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.25646/1279
Human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C and hepatitis B infections among blood donors in Germany 2000-2002: risk of virus transmission and the impact of nucleic acid amplification testing.
dc.contributor.authorOffergeld, Ruth
dc.contributor.authorFaensen, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorRitter, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorHamouda, Osamah
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-07T16:04:16Z
dc.date.available2018-05-07T16:04:16Z
dc.date.created2012-11-07
dc.date.issued2005-02-01none
dc.identifier.otherhttp://edoc.rki.de/oa/articles/renzwQDUq1lw/PDF/24APEhMbj3wMc.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.rki.de/176904/1354
dc.description.abstractBlood and plasma donations in Germany are collected by several institutions, namely the German Red Cross, community and hospital-based blood services, private blood centres, commercial plasma donation sites and transfusion services of the army. All blood donation centres are required to report quarterly data on infection markers to the Robert Koch Institute, thus providing current and accurate epidemiological data. The prevalence and incidence of relevant viral infections are low in the blood donor population in Germany, with a decreasing trend for hepatitis C infections in new and repeat donors since 1997. The implementation of mandatory nucleic acid amplification technique (NAT) testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) in 1999 has markedly improved transfusion safety. HIV-NAT became mandatory in 2004 but was done voluntarily by the majority of the blood donation services before then. The potential benefit of hepatitis B virus (HBV) minipool NAT is not as clear because chronic HBV carriers with very low virus levels might donate unidentified. The residual risk of an infectious window period donation inadvertently entering the blood supply can be estimated using a mathematic model which multiplies the incidence rate by the number of days during which an infection may be present but not detectable, i.e. the length of the window period. The risk of an undetected infection without NAT testing was estimated to be 1 in 2,770,000 for HIV, 1 in 670,000 for HCV and 1 in 230,000 for HBV in 2001/2002. This contrasts with 1 in 5,540,000 for HIV, 1 in 4,400,000 for HCV and 1 in 620,000 for HBV with minipool NAT testing. This demonstrates that NAT testing can further reduce the already very small risk of infectious donations entering the blood supply.eng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherRobert Koch-Institut
dc.subjectHumanseng
dc.subjectGermany/epidemiologyeng
dc.subjectIncidenceeng
dc.subjectRisk Assessment/methodseng
dc.subjectRisk Factorseng
dc.subjectHIV Infections/epidemiologyeng
dc.subjectDisease Transmissioneng
dc.subjectHepatitis C/epidemiologyeng
dc.subjectHIV Infections/transmissioneng
dc.subjectHepatitis B/epidemiologyeng
dc.subjectHepatitis B/transmissioneng
dc.subjectHepatitis C/transmissioneng
dc.subjectMass Screening/statistics & numerical dataeng
dc.subjectBlood Transfusion/statistics & numerical dataeng
dc.subjectDNA Viral/bloodeng
dc.subjectInfectious/statistics & numerical dataeng
dc.subjectMass Screening/trendseng
dc.subjectNucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/statistics & numerical dataeng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin
dc.titleHuman immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C and hepatitis B infections among blood donors in Germany 2000-2002: risk of virus transmission and the impact of nucleic acid amplification testing.
dc.typeperiodicalPart
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0257-10028374
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25646/1279
local.edoc.container-titleEuroSurveillance
local.edoc.fp-subtypeArtikel
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-urlhttp://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=522
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameECDC
local.edoc.container-volume10
local.edoc.container-issue2
local.edoc.container-year2005

Zur Kurzanzeige