Show simple item record

2024-10-07Zeitschriftenartikel
Standardised reporting of burden of disease studies: the STROBOD statement
dc.contributor.authorDevleeschauwer, Brecht
dc.contributor.authorCharalampous, Periklis
dc.contributor.authorGorasso, Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorAssunção, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorHilderink, Henk
dc.contributor.authorIdavain, Jane
dc.contributor.authorLesnik, Tina
dc.contributor.authorSantric-Milicevic, Milena
dc.contributor.authorPallari, Elena
dc.contributor.authorPires, Sara M.
dc.contributor.authorPlass, Dietrich
dc.contributor.authorWyper, Grant M. A.
dc.contributor.authorVon der Lippe, Elena
dc.contributor.authorHaagsma, Juanita A.
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-18T12:39:33Z
dc.date.available2026-03-18T12:39:33Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-07none
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s12963-024-00347-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.rki.de/176904/13562
dc.description.abstractBackground: The burden of disease (BOD) approach, originating with the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study in the 1990s, has become a cornerstone for population health monitoring. Despite the widespread use of the Disability-Adjusted Life Year (DALY) metric, variations in methodological approaches and reporting inconsistencies hinder comparability across studies. To tackle this issue, we set out to develop guidelines for reporting DALY calculation studies to improve the transparency and comparability of BOD estimates. Methods and Findings: The development of the STROBOD statement began within the European Burden of Disease Network, evolving from initial concepts discussed in workshops and training sessions focused on critical analysis of BOD studies. In 2021, a working group was formed to refine the preliminary version into the final Standardised Reporting of Burden of Disease studies (STROBOD) statement, consisting of 28 items structured across six main sections. These sections cover the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and open science, aiming to ensure transparency and standardization in reporting BOD studies. Notably, the methods section of the STROBOD checklist encompasses aspects such as study setting, data inputs and adjustments, DALY calculation methods, uncertainty analyses, and recommendations for reproducibility and transparency. A pilot phase was conducted to test the efficacy of the STROBOD statement, highlighting the importance of providing clear explanations and examples for each reporting item. Conclusions: The inaugural STROBOD statement offers a crucial framework for standardizing reporting in BOD research, with plans for ongoing evaluation and potential revisions based on user feedback. While the current version focuses on general BOD methodology, future iterations may include specialized checklists for distinct applications such as injury or risk factor estimation, reflecting the dynamic nature of this field.eng
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherRobert Koch-Institut
dc.rights(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschlandger
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/
dc.subjectBurden of diseaseeng
dc.subjectDisability-adjusted life yearseng
dc.subjectEuropean burden of disease networkeng
dc.subjectChecklisteng
dc.subjectReporting guidelineseng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin und Gesundheitnone
dc.titleStandardised reporting of burden of disease studies: the STROBOD statementnone
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0257-176904/13562-7
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.container-titlePopulation Health Metricsnone
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameSpringer Naturenone
local.edoc.container-reportyear2024none
local.edoc.container-firstpage1none
local.edoc.container-lastpage7none
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewednone

Show simple item record