2024-10-21Zeitschriftenartikel
Beyond buzzwords: fostering interdisciplinary and collaborative global health research in Germany and beyond
Cook-Deegan, Maeve
Böge, Kerem
Bruchhausen, Walter
Chagunda, Mizeck
Chaturvedi, Medha
Esen, Meral
Hanefeld, Johanna
Kampmann, Beate
Köhler, Carsten
Köhler, Charlotte
Osei, Francis
Prazeres da Costa, Clarissa
Rehfuess, Eva
Velavan, Thirumalaisamy P.
Anton, Nora
on behalf of the GLOHRA Steering Committee
Background:
Germany has increased its political and financial commitment for global health, but this needs to be backed by a robust global health research ecosystem with strong partnerships in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Objective:
This article suggests pathways for empowering researchers to operate beyond their disciplinary silos and strengthen partnerships across sectors and countries. The authors identify barriers and enablers of operations from a nascent research network in Germany, trusting that this experience can inform other initiatives seeking to stoke interdisciplinary and collaborative global health research.
Methods:
This article represents the culmination of extensive reflections spanning the initial four years of the German Alliance for Global Health Research (GLOHRA). The insights have additionally been informed by an analysis of publicly available reports, internal procedural records, and externally conducted studies based on interviews with researchers and policymakers.
Results:
GLOHRA has developed a toolbox of practices that foster interdisciplinary research and support capacity-building. Insights indicate that highly interdisciplinary and diverse governance structures and seed-funding for interdisciplinary and cross-sector research with appropriate review processes represent a critical step for achieving these aims. Additionally, inclusive training sessions and networking events help to bridge disciplinary boundaries, equipping researchers to envision the broader context of their work.
Conclusions:
Despite achievements, challenges persist. Wider support, especially from universities and research institutions, is necessary to make global health research an attractive career path and to reduce bureaucratic barriers for collaborators in LMICs. Sustained, longer-term federal funding mechanisms will also be essential for ongoing progress.
Dateien zu dieser Publikation
Verwandte Publikationen
Anzeige der Publikationen mit ähnlichem Titel, Autor, Urheber und Thema.
-
2022-07-30Zeitschriftenartikel“What Do You Need? What Are You Experiencing?” Relationship Building and Power Dynamics in Participatory Research Projects: Critical Self-Reflections of Researchers Arnold, Doris; Glässel, Andrea; Böttger, Tabea; Sarma, Navina; Bethmann, Andreas; Narimani, PetraParticipatory approaches create opportunities for cooperation, building relationships, gaining knowledge, rethinking, and eventually changing power structures. From an international perspective, the article looks at the ...
-
2003-10-15Berichte und sonstige TexteReport of the Central Ethics Committee for Stem Cell Research First Report after Enactment of the Stem Cell Act (Stammzellgesetz, StZG). Reporting period 22 July 2002 to 30 September 2003ZES
-
2009-12-14Berichte und sonstige TexteReport of the Central Ethics Committee for Stem Cell Research (ZES) Seventh Report after the enactment of the Stem Cell Act (StZG). Reporting period: 1 December 2008 to 30 November 2009ZES
