Strong correlation between the rates of intrinsically antibiotic-resistant species and the rates of acquired resistance in Gram-negative species causing bacteraemia, EU/EEA, 2016
Jarlier, Vincent
Diaz Högberg, Liselotte
Heuer, Ole E.
Campos, José
Eckmanns, Tim
Giske, Christian G.
Grundmann, Hajo
Johnson, Alan P.
Kahlmeter, Gunnar
Monen, Jos
Pantosti, Annalisa
Rossolini, Gian Maria
van de Sande-Bruinsma, Nienke
Vatopoulus, Alkiviadis
Żabicka, Dorota
Žemličková, Helena
Monnet, Dominique L.
Skov Simonsen, Gunnar
EARS-Net participants
Noll, Ines
Background
Antibiotic resistance, either intrinsic or acquired, is a major obstacle for treating bacterial infections.
Aim
Our objective was to compare the country-specific species distribution of the four Gram-negative species Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species and the proportions of selected acquired resistance traits within these species.
Method
We used data reported for 2016 to the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) by 30 countries in the European Union and European Economic Area.
Results
The country-specific species distribution varied considerably. While E. coli accounted for 31.9% to 81.0% (median: 69.0%) of all reported isolates, the two most common intrinsically resistant species P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. combined (PSEACI) accounted for 5.5% to 39.2% of isolates (median: 10.1%). Similarly, large national differences were noted for the percentages of acquired non-susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins, carbapenems and fluoroquinolones. There was a strong positive rank correlation between the country-specific percentages of PSEACI and the percentages of non-susceptibility to the above antibiotics in all four species (rho > 0.75 for 10 of the 11 pairs of variables tested).
Conclusion
Countries with the highest proportion of P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. were also those where the rates of acquired non-susceptibility in all four studied species were highest. The differences are probably related to national differences in antibiotic consumption and infection prevention and control routines.
Dateien zu dieser Publikation

