Zur Kurzanzeige

2015-03-13Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ199
Outbreak of Trichinellosis Due to Wild Boar Meat and Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Post Exposure Prophylaxis, Germany, 2013
dc.contributor.authorFaber, Mirko
dc.contributor.authorSchink, Susanne
dc.contributor.authorMayer-Scholl, Anne
dc.contributor.authorZiesch, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorSchönfelder, Ralph
dc.contributor.authorWichmann-Schauer, Heidi
dc.contributor.authorStark, Klaus
dc.contributor.authorNöckler, Karsten
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-07T18:21:41Z
dc.date.available2018-05-07T18:21:41Z
dc.date.created2015-08-05
dc.date.issued2015-03-13none
dc.identifier.otherhttp://edoc.rki.de/oa/articles/rephKOB5fQoT/PDF/25MSrMXa62gc.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.rki.de/176904/2099
dc.description.abstractBackground: Food safety authorities discovered that wild boar meat products contaminated with Trichinella spiralis had entered the food chain in Germany in March 2013. Public health authorities issued guidelines for health professionals including post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) using mebendazole and advised the public to seek medical advice if exposed. Our objective was to identify factors associated with the development of trichinellosis and to evaluate post exposure prophylaxis. Methods: Persons who reported to local public health departments as exposed were interviewed concerning exposure, symptoms, and medication. Serum samples were tested by an in-house Trichinella-specific enzyme-linked innunosorbent assay. Cases were defined as persons presenting with myalgia and/or periorbital edema and Trichinella-specific immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G antibodies after exposure to implicated products. Results: Of 101 persons interviewed, 71 were exposed and serologically tested. Antibodies were detected in 21/71 (30%) and 14/71 (20%) met the case definition. Attack rates were positively correlated to the amount of implicated product consumed. Among n = 37 persons who received anthelmintics as PEP, 6 persons developed trichinellosis. These cases exclusively occurred among persons starting PEP 6 days or later post-exposure. Exposure to implicated products and delaying PEP were also significantly associated with developing trichinellosis (P < .01) in a multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Concerted efforts by food safety and public health authorities lead to timely outbreak control and facilitated the provision of early PEP. PEP appears to be effective in preventing trichinellosis when given early, preferably within 6 days. We therefore recommend initiating PEP without delay in similar settings and encourage public health professionals to fast-track this intervention.eng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherRobert Koch-Institut, Infektionsepidemiologie
dc.subjectAnimalseng
dc.subjectHumanseng
dc.subjectFemaleeng
dc.subjectMaleeng
dc.subjectAdolescenteng
dc.subjectAdulteng
dc.subjectAgedeng
dc.subjectGermany/epidemiologyeng
dc.subjectMiddle Agedeng
dc.subjectRisk Factorseng
dc.subjectYoung Adulteng
dc.subjectAged 80 and overeng
dc.subjectChild Preschooleng
dc.subjectChildeng
dc.subjectDisease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical dataeng
dc.subjectSwineeng
dc.subjectDisease Outbreaks/prevention & controleng
dc.subjectAntinematodal Agents/administration & dosageeng
dc.subjectAntinematodal Agents/therapeutic useeng
dc.subjectMeat/parasitologyeng
dc.subjectMebendazole/administration & dosageeng
dc.subjectMebendazole/therapeutic useeng
dc.subjectPost-Exposure Prophylaxiseng
dc.subjectSus scrofa/parasitologyeng
dc.subjectTrichinellosis/drug therapyeng
dc.subjectTrichinellosis/epidemiologyeng
dc.subjectTrichinellosis/prevention & controleng
dc.subjectTrichinellosis/transmissioneng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin
dc.titleOutbreak of Trichinellosis Due to Wild Boar Meat and Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Post Exposure Prophylaxis, Germany, 2013
dc.typeperiodicalPart
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0257-10040099
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/cid/civ199
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25646/2024
local.edoc.container-titleClinical Infectious Diseases
local.edoc.fp-subtypeArtikel
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-urlhttp://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/60/12/e98
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameOxford University Press
local.edoc.container-volume60
local.edoc.container-issue12
local.edoc.container-year2015

Zur Kurzanzeige