Zur Kurzanzeige

2007-07-03Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-7-72
First international diagnostic accuracy study for the serological detection of West Nile virus infection
dc.contributor.authorNiedrig, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorMantke, Oliver Donoso
dc.contributor.authorAltmann, Doris
dc.contributor.authorZeller, Hervé
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-07T13:25:06Z
dc.date.available2018-05-07T13:25:06Z
dc.date.created2009-12-02
dc.date.issued2007-07-03none
dc.identifier.otherhttp://edoc.rki.de/oa/articles/retzRqdNBbiQ/PDF/27Rcx7ud8lj7A.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.rki.de/176904/490
dc.description.abstractBackground: The diagnosis of an acute or convalescent West Nile (WN) virus infection can be confirmed by various serological assays such as enzyme immunoassay (EIA), immunofluorescence assay (IFA), or neutralisation test (NT) which are conducted by a growing number of laboratories. However, as the degree of proficiency may vary between laboratories, quality control measures for laboratory diagnostics are essential. Methods: We have performed an external quality assurance (EQA) programme for the serological detection of WN virus infection to assess the diagnostic quality of laboratories. The participating laboratories received a proficiency panel of 10 coded lyophilised test samples comprising four antisera positive for WN antibodies as positive controls, three antisera positive for antibodies against other heterologous flaviviruses plus one multireactive unspecific serum as specificity controls, and two negative serum samples. Results: Twenty-seven laboratories from 20 different countries in Europe, the Middle East, the Americas and Africa participated in this EQA programme. Applying the proficiency criteria of this study, only eight laboratories correctly analysed all samples with their respective EIA, IFA or NT methods. Eighteen laboratories correctly identified between 77.8 and 90% of the samples, and one laboratory identified only 70% correctly with a clear need to eliminate cross-reactivity with other antisera, particularly those elicited by yellow fever virus. Differentiation between the results for IgM and IgG was considered separately and revealed that IgM-antibodies were detected less frequently than IgG-antibodies (p < 0.001). However, the assay used was not a significant technical factor influencing laboratory performance. Conclusion: The EQA programme provides information on the quality of different serological assays used by the participating laboratories and indicates that most need to improve their assays, in particular to avoid cross-reactions with antibodies to heterologous flaviviruses.eng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherRobert Koch-Institut, Infektionsepidemiologie; Robert Koch-Institut, Biologische Sicherheit
dc.subjectHumanseng
dc.subjectAntibodieseng
dc.subjectViral/analysiseng
dc.subjectAntibodieseng
dc.subjectViral/immunologyeng
dc.subjectCross Reactionseng
dc.subjectImmunologic Tests/methodseng
dc.subjectInternationalityeng
dc.subjectQuality Assuranceeng
dc.subjectHealth Careeng
dc.subjectQuality Controleng
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificityeng
dc.subjectSerologiceng
dc.subjectTests/methodseng
dc.subjectWest Nile Fever/diagnosiseng
dc.subjectWest Nileeng
dc.subjectFever/immunologyeng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin
dc.titleFirst international diagnostic accuracy study for the serological detection of West Nile virus infection
dc.typeperiodicalPart
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0257-1003055
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2334-7-72
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25646/415
local.edoc.container-titleBMC Infectious Diseases
local.edoc.fp-subtypeArtikel
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-urlhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/7/72
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameBioMedCentral
local.edoc.container-volume7
local.edoc.container-issue72
local.edoc.container-year2007

Zur Kurzanzeige