Zur Kurzanzeige

2011-02-15Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-16
A clinical trial alert tool to recruit large patient samples and assess selection bias in general practice research
dc.contributor.authorHeinemann, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorThüring, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorWedeken, Sven
dc.contributor.authorSchäfer, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorScheidt-Nave, Christa
dc.contributor.authorKetterer, Mirko
dc.contributor.authorHimmel, Wolfgang
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-07T14:27:32Z
dc.date.available2018-05-07T14:27:32Z
dc.date.created2011-03-03
dc.date.issued2011-02-15none
dc.identifier.otherhttp://edoc.rki.de/oa/articles/remXIe3uEwX2/PDF/25o52Hpf2.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.rki.de/176904/827
dc.description.abstractBackground: Many research projects in general practice face problems when recruiting patients, often resulting in low recruitment rates and an unknown selection bias, thus limiting their value for health services research. The objective of the study is to evaluate the recruitment performance of the practice staff in 25 participating general practices when using a clinical trial alert (CTA) tool. Methods: The CTA tool was developed for an osteoporosis survey of patients at risk for osteoporosis and fractures. The tool used data from electronic patient records (EPRs) to automatically identify the population at risk (net sample), to apply eligibility criteria, to contact eligible patients, to enrol and survey at least 200 patients per practice. The effects of the CTA intervention were evaluated on the basis of recruitment efficiency and selection bias. Results: The CTA tool identified a net sample of 16,067 patients (range 162 to 1,316 per practice), of which the practice staff reviewed 5,161 (32%) cases for eligibility. They excluded 3,248 patients and contacted 1,913 patients. Of these, 1,526 patients (range 4 to 202 per practice) were successfully enrolled and surveyed. This made up 9% of the net sample and 80% of the patients contacted. Men and older patients were underrepresented in the study population. Conclusion: Although the recruitment target was unreachable for most practices, the practice staff in the participating practices used the CTA tool successfully to identify, document and survey a large patient sample. The tool also helped the research team to precisely determine a slight selection bias.ger
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherRobert Koch-Institut, Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsberichterstattung
dc.subjectAgedeng
dc.subjectHumanseng
dc.subjectFemaleeng
dc.subjectMaleeng
dc.subjectMiddle Agedeng
dc.subjectSelection Biaseng
dc.subjectProspective Studieseng
dc.subjectAged 80 and overeng
dc.subjectClinical Trials as Topiceng
dc.subjectEligibility Determinationeng
dc.subjectGeneral Practice/organization & administrationeng
dc.subjectGeneral Practitionerseng
dc.subjectHealth Surveys/methodseng
dc.subjectNurseseng
dc.subjectOsteoporosis/prevention & controleng
dc.subjectPatient Selectioneng
dc.subjectSampling Studieseng
dc.subjectSoftwareeng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin
dc.titleA clinical trial alert tool to recruit large patient samples and assess selection bias in general practice research
dc.typeperiodicalPart
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0257-10012728
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2288-11-16
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25646/752
local.edoc.container-titleBMC Medical Research Methodology
local.edoc.fp-subtypeArtikel
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-urlhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/16
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameBioMedCentral
local.edoc.container-volume11
local.edoc.container-issue16
local.edoc.container-year2011

Zur Kurzanzeige