Zur Kurzanzeige

2020-12-23Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.25646/8811
Improving National Intelligence for Public Health Preparedness: a methodological approach to finding local multi-sector indicators for health security
dc.contributor.authorErondu, Ngozi A
dc.contributor.authorRahman-Shepherd, Afifah
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Mishal S
dc.contributor.authorAbate, Ebba
dc.contributor.authorAgogo, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorBelfroid, Evelien
dc.contributor.authorDar, Osman
dc.contributor.authorHollmann, Lara
dc.contributor.authorFehr, Angela
dc.contributor.authorIhekweazu, Chikwe
dc.contributor.authorIkram, Aamer
dc.contributor.authorIversen, Bjorn Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorMirkuzie, Alemnesh H
dc.contributor.authorRathore, Tayyab Razi
dc.contributor.authorSquires, Neil
dc.contributor.authorOkereke, Ebere
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-16T08:52:16Z
dc.date.available2021-07-16T08:52:16Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-23none
dc.identifier.other10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004227
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.rki.de/176904/8536
dc.description.abstractThe COVID-19 epidemic is the latest evidence of critical gaps in our collective ability to monitor country-level preparedness for health emergencies. The global frameworks that exist to strengthen core public health capacities lack coverage of several preparedness domains and do not provide mechanisms to interface with local intelligence. We designed and piloted a process, in collaboration with three National Public Health Institutes (NPHIs) in Ethiopia, Nigeria and Pakistan, to identify potential preparedness indicators that exist in a myriad of frameworks and tools in varying local institutions. Following a desk-based systematic search and expert consultations, indicators were extracted from existing national and subnational health security-relevant frameworks and prioritised in a multi-stakeholder two-round Delphi process. Eighty-six indicators in Ethiopia, 87 indicators in Nigeria and 51 indicators in Pakistan were assessed to be valid, relevant and feasible. From these, 14–16 indicators were prioritised in each of the three countries for consideration in monitoring and evaluation tools. Priority indicators consistently included private sector metrics, subnational capacities, availability and capacity for electronic surveillance, measures of timeliness for routine reporting, data quality scores and data related to internally displaced persons and returnees. NPHIs play an increasingly central role in health security and must have access to data needed to identify and respond rapidly to public health threats. Collecting and collating local sources of information may prove essential to addressing gaps; it is a necessary step towards improving preparedness and strengthening international health regulations compliance.eng
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherRobert Koch-Institut
dc.rights(CC BY-NC 3.0 DE) Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell 3.0 Deutschlandger
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/de/
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin und Gesundheitnone
dc.titleImproving National Intelligence for Public Health Preparedness: a methodological approach to finding local multi-sector indicators for health securitynone
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:kobv:0257-176904/8536-9
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25646/8811
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionnone
local.edoc.container-titleBMJ Global Healthnone
local.edoc.container-issn2059-7908none
local.edoc.pages14none
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-urlhttps://gh.bmj.com/content/6/1/e004227.citation-toolsnone
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameBMJ Publishing Groupnone
local.edoc.rki-departmentInstitutsleitungnone

Zur Kurzanzeige