Logo des Robert Koch-InstitutLogo des Robert Koch-Institut
Publikationsserver des Robert Koch-Institutsedoc
de|en
Publikation anzeigen 
  • edoc Startseite
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Journal of Health Monitoring
  • Publikation anzeigen
  • edoc Startseite
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Journal of Health Monitoring
  • Publikation anzeigen
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Gesamter edoc-ServerBereiche & SammlungenTitelAutorSchlagwortDiese SammlungTitelAutorSchlagwort
PublizierenEinloggenRegistrierenHilfe
StatistikNutzungsstatistik
Gesamter edoc-ServerBereiche & SammlungenTitelAutorSchlagwortDiese SammlungTitelAutorSchlagwort
PublizierenEinloggenRegistrierenHilfe
StatistikNutzungsstatistik
Publikation anzeigen 
  • edoc Startseite
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Journal of Health Monitoring
  • Publikation anzeigen
  • edoc Startseite
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Journal of Health Monitoring
  • Publikation anzeigen
2024-06-19Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.25646/12100
Potential COVID-19 test fraud detection: Findings from a pilot study comparing conventional and statistical approaches
Bosnjak, Michael
Dahm, Stefan
Kuhnert, Ronny
Weihrauch, Dennis
Schaffrath Rosario, Angelika
Hurraß, Julia
Schmich, Patrick
Wieler, Lothar H.
Background: Some COVID-19 testing centres have reported manipulated test numbers for antigen tests/rapid tests. This study compares statistical approaches with traditional fraud detection methods. The extent of agreement between traditional and statistical methods was analysed, as well as the extent to which statistical approaches can identify additional cases of potential fraud. Methods: Outlier detection marking a high number of tests, modeling of the positivity rate (Poisson Regression), deviation from distributional assumptions regarding the first digit (Benford’s Law) and the last digit of the number of reported tests. The basis of the analyses were billing data (April 2021 to August 2022) from 907 testing centres in a German city. Results: The positive agreement between the conventional and statistical approaches (‘sensitivity’) was between 8.6% and 24.7%, the negative agreement (‘specificity’) was between 91.3% and 94.6%. The proportion of potentially fraudulent testing centres additionally identified by statistical approaches was between 7.0% and 8.7%. The combination of at least two statistical methods resulted in an optimal detection rate of test centres with previously undetected initial suspicion. Conclusions: The statistical approaches were more effective and systematic in identifying potentially fraudulent testing centres than the conventional methods. Testing centres should be urged to map paradata (e.g. timestamps of testing) in future pandemics.
Dateien zu dieser Publikation
Thumbnail
JHealthMonit_2024_02_COVID-19_Test_Fraud-1.pdf — PDF — 575.3 Kb
MD5: e7e6892916cbc33defa72c41725c72f5
Zitieren
BibTeX
EndNote
RIS
(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschland(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschland
Zur Langanzeige
Nutzungsbedingungen Impressum Leitlinien Datenschutzerklärung Kontakt

Das Robert Koch-Institut ist ein Bundesinstitut im

Geschäftsbereich des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit

© Robert Koch Institut

Alle Rechte vorbehalten, soweit nicht ausdrücklich anders vermerkt.

 
DOI
10.25646/12100
Permanent URL
https://doi.org/10.25646/12100
HTML
<a href="https://doi.org/10.25646/12100">https://doi.org/10.25646/12100</a>