Logo of Robert Koch InstituteLogo of Robert Koch Institute
Publication Server of Robert Koch Instituteedoc
de|en
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • View Item
2011-09-03Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.08.010
Second external quality assessment of the molecular diagnostic of West Nile virus: Are there improvements towards the detection of WNV?
Linke, Sonja
MacKay, William G.
Scott, Calum
Wallace, Paul
Niedrig, Matthias
Background: WNV epidemics occur worldwide, new WNV isolates were isolated in southern-east Europe belonging to WNV lineage 2. A first international proficiency study on WNV indicted that some laboratories were not able to detect WNV lineage 2 virus genome by their PCR diagnostic assays. Therefore an actual External Quality Assessment with both virus lineages was performed to monitor the improvements in molecular diagnostics. Objectives: To asses the proficiency of laboratories to detect West Nile virus with molecular diagnostic tests. Study design: A test panel of different WNV isolates and virus dilutions was given to 26 laboratories to test the samples with their routine diagnostic methods. Results: Twenty-one participating laboratories provided 28 data set results. WNV lineage 1 was detected with high overall efficiency of 92% (67.9–100%) but two different WNV lineage 2 strains were detected at lower rates (mean = 73%, 67.9–75%) by the different PCR assays. 93% of the laboratories were able to detect a WNV lineage 1 with a concentration of 1.2 × 104 copies/ml but the detection rate was decreased to 68% for 1.2 × 103 copies/ml. One laboratory generated false-positive result from the non-virus control samples and 29% of the datasets showed false-positive results for non-WNV flavivirus samples. Conclusions: The WNV EQA showed an improved proficiency of laboratories as compared to the first EQA. However, the data suggest that problems in the detection of both lineages were still present since the first proficiency test was performed in 2006. Further proceedings versus the detection of both lineages are needed particularly for in-house assays.
Files in this item
Thumbnail
23WyM6moq7f5o.pdf — Adobe PDF — 266.3 Kb
MD5: eb9f3e26cbb74ce31e6629d11eeef8eb
Cite
BibTeX
EndNote
RIS
No license information
Details
Terms of Use Imprint Policy Data Privacy Statement Contact

The Robert Koch Institute is a Federal Institute

within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health

© Robert Koch Institute

All rights reserved unless explicitly granted.

 
DOI
10.1016/j.jcv.2011.08.010
Permanent URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2011.08.010
HTML
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2011.08.010">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2011.08.010</a>