2024-09-12Zeitschriftenartikel
Diabetes self-management education programs: Results from a nationwide population-based study on characteristics of participants, rating of programs and reasons for non-participation
Weise, Solveig
Du, Yong
Heidemann, Christin
Baumert, Jens
Frese, Thomas
Heise, Marcus
Objective:
Population-based studies of reasons for not participating in diabetes self-management education (DSME) are scarce. Therefore, we investigated what sociodemographic and disease-related factors are associated with participation in DSME, the reasons for not participating in DSME and how participants evaluate DSME.
Research design and methods:
We used data from the nationwide survey “Disease knowledge and information needs–Diabetes mellitus 2017”, which included a total of 1396 participants diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (diabetes; n = 394 DSME-participants, n = 1002 DSME-never-participants). Analyses used weighted logistic or multinominal regression analyses with bivariate and multivariable approaches.
Results:
Participants were more likely to attend DSME if they had a medium (OR 1.82 [95%CI 1.21–2.73]),or high (OR 2.04 [95%CI 1.30–3.21]) level of education, had type 1 diabetes (OR 2.46 [1.24–4.90]) and insulin treatment (OR 1.96 [95%CI 1.33–2.90]). Participants were less likely to attend DSME if they lived in East Germany (OR 0.57 [95%CI 0.39–0.83]), had diabetes for >2 to 5 years (OR 0.52 [95%CI 0.31–0.88] compared to >5 years), did not agree that diabetes is a lifelong disease (OR 0.30 [95%CI 0.15–0.62], had never been encouraged by their physician to attend DSME (OR 0.19 [95%CI 0.13–0.27]) and were not familiar with disease management programs (OR 0.67 [95%CI 0.47–0.96]). The main reasons for non-participation were participant’s personal perception that DSME was not necessary (26.6%), followed by lack of recommendation from treating physician (25.7%) and lack of information on DSME (20.7%). DSME-participants found DSME more helpful if they had a medium educational level (OR 2.06 [95%CI 1.10–3.89] ref: low level of education) and less helpful if they were never encouraged by their treatment team (OR 0.46 [95%CI 0.26–0.82]).
Discussion:
Professionals treating persons with diabetes should encourage their patients to attend DSME and underline that diabetes is a lifelong disease. Overall, the majority of DSME participants rated DSME as helpful.
Files in this item
Related Items
Show related Items with similar Title, Author, Creator or Subject.
-
2019-06-19ZeitschriftenartikelTypes of diabetes are not limited to age groups: type 1 diabetes in adults and type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents Rosenbauer, Joachim; Neu, Andreas; Rothe, Ulrike; Seufert, Jochen; Holl, Reinhard W.Based on data from the national diabetes registry DPV (Diabetes patient documentation), the diabetes registry of North Rhine-Westphalia and surveys conducted at hospitals and practices in Baden-Württemberg and Saxony, ...
-
2017-05-03ZeitschriftenartikelLongitudinal change in health-related quality of life in people with prevalent and incident type 2 diabetes compared to diabetes-free controls Schunk, Michaela; Reitmeir, Peter; Rückert-Eheberg, Ina-Maria; Tamayo, Teresa; Schipf, Sabine; Meisinger, Christa; Peters, Annette; Scheidt-Nave, Christa; Ellert, Ute; Hartwig, Saskia; Kluttig, Alexander; Völzke, Henry; Holle, RolfObjective: The objective of this analysis is to compare people with prevalent type 2 diabetes, incident type 2 diabetes and without diabetes with respect to longitudinal change in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) ...
-
2012-05-13MasterarbeitEvaluation of the German Diabetes Risk Score as a screening tool for undiagnosed diabetes Paprott, RebeccaBackground: Regional German studies estimated the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes to be almost as high as the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes. Even before symptoms of diabetes occur, diabetes related secondary diseases ...

