Logo of Robert Koch InstituteLogo of Robert Koch Institute
Publication Server of Robert Koch Instituteedoc
de|en
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • View Item
2020-06-03Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.037
Early smallpox vaccine manufacturing in the United States: Introduction of the “animal vaccine” in 1870, establishment of “vaccine farms”, and the beginnings of the vaccine industry
Esparza, José
Lederman, Seth
Nitsche, Andreas
Damaso, Clarissa R.
For the first 80–90 years after Jenner’s discovery of vaccination in 1796, the main strategy used to disseminate and maintain the smallpox vaccine was arm-to-arm vaccination, also known as Jennerian or humanized vaccination. A major advance occurred after 1860 with the development of what was known as “animal vaccine”, which referred to growing vaccine material from serial propagation in calves before use in humans. The use of “animal vaccine” had several advantages over arm-to-arm vaccination: it would not transmit syphilis or other human diseases, it ensured a supply of vaccine even in the absence of the spontaneous occurrence of cases of cowpox or horsepox, and it allowed the production of large amounts of vaccine. The “animal vaccine” concept was introduced in the United States in 1870 by Henry Austin Martin. Very rapidly a number of “vaccine farms” were established in the U.S. and produced large quantities of “animal vaccine”. These “vaccine farms” were mostly established by medical doctors who saw an opportunity to respond to an increasing demand of smallpox vaccine from individuals and from health authorities, and to make a profit. The “vaccine farms” evolved from producing only smallpox “animal vaccine” to manufacturing several other biologics, including diphtheria- and other antitoxins. Two major incidents of tetanus contamination happened in 1901, which led to the promulgation of the Biologics Control Act of 1902. The US Secretary of the Treasury issued licenses to produce and sell biologicals, mainly vaccines and antitoxins. Through several mergers and acquisitions, the initial biologics licensees eventually evolved into some of the current major American industrial vaccine companies. An important aspect that was never clarified was the source of the vaccine stocks used to manufacture the smallpox “animal vaccines”. Most likely, different smallpox vaccine stocks were repeatedly introduced from Europe, resulting in polyclonal vaccines that are now recognized as “variants” more appropriately than “strains”. Further, clonal analysis of modern “animal vaccines” indicate that they are probably derived from complex recombinational events between different strains of vaccinia and horsepox. Modern sequencing technologies are now been used by us to study old smallpox vaccine specimens in an effort to better understand the origin and evolution of the vaccines that were used to eradicate the smallpox.
Files in this item
Thumbnail
1-s2.0-S0264410X2030668X-main.pdf — Adobe PDF — 884.9 Kb
MD5: cad338482cb17c1fc47c3386a587e7b5
Cite
BibTeX
EndNote
RIS
(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschland(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschland
Details

Related Items

Show related Items with similar Title, Author, Creator or Subject.

  • 2011-12-27Zeitschriftenartikel
    Single Dose Novel Salmonella Vaccine Enhances Resistance against Visceralizing L. major and L. donovani Infection in Susceptible BALB/c Mice. 
    Schroeder, Juliane; Brown, Najmeeyah; Kaye, Paul; Aebischer, Toni
    Visceral leishmaniasis is a major neglected tropical disease, with an estimated 500,000 new cases and more than 50,000 deaths attributable to this disease every year. Drug therapy is available but costly and resistance ...
  • 2011-09-14Zeitschriftenartikel
    Influenza B Virus With Modified Hemagglutinin Cleavage Site as a Novel Attenuated Live Vaccine 
    Stech, Jürgen; Garn, Holger; Herwig, Astrid; Stech, Olga; Dauber, Bianca; Wolff, Thorsten; Mettenleiter, Thomas C.; Klenk, Hans-Dieter
    Background: Both pandemic and interpandemic influenza is associated with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Seasonal epidemics are caused by both influenza A and B virus strains that cocirculate with varying predominance ...
  • 2015-04-28Zeitschriftenartikel
    The European I-MOVE Multicentre 2013–2014 Case-Control Study. Homogeneous moderate influenza vaccine effectiveness against A(H1N1)pdm09 and heterogenous results by country against A(H3N2) 
    Valenciano, Marta; Kissling, Esther; Reuss, Annicka; Jiménez-Jorge, Silvia; Horváth, Judit K.; Donnell, Joan M.O.; Pitigoi, Daniela; Machado, Ausenda; Pozo, Francisco
    Background: In the first five I-MOVE (Influenza Monitoring Vaccine Effectiveness in Europe) influenza seasons vaccine effectiveness (VE) results were relatively homogenous among participating study sites. In 2013–2014, ...
Terms of Use Imprint Policy Data Privacy Statement Contact

The Robert Koch Institute is a Federal Institute

within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health

© Robert Koch Institute

All rights reserved unless explicitly granted.

 
DOI
10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.037
Permanent URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.037
HTML
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.037">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.037</a>