Logo of Robert Koch InstituteLogo of Robert Koch Institute
Publication Server of Robert Koch Instituteedoc
de|en
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
All of edoc-ServerCommunity & CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubject
PublishLoginRegisterHelp
StatisticsView Usage Statistics
View Item 
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • View Item
  • edoc-Server Home
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • View Item
2019-10-04Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.25646/6617
Secondary prevention measures in anaphylaxis patients: Data from the anaphylaxis registry
Kraft, Magdalena
Knop, Macarena Pia
Renaudin, Jean-Marie
Scherer Hofmeier, Kathrin
Pföhler, Claudia
Bilò, Maria Beatrice
Lang, Roland
Treudler, Regina
Wagner, Nicola
Spindler, Thomas
O'B Hourihane, Jonathan
Maris, Ioana
Koehli, Alice
Bauer, Andrea
Lange, Lars
Müller, Sabine
Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G.
Wedi, Bettina
Moeser, Anne
Ensina, Luis F.
Fernandez-Rivas, Montserrat
Cichocka-Jarosz, Ewa
Christoff, George
Garcia, Blanca E.
Poziomkowska-Gęsicka, Iwona
Cardona, Victoria
Mustakov, Tihomir B.
Rabe, Uta
Mahler, Vera
Grabenhenrich, Linus
Dölle-Bierke, Sabine
Worm, Margitta
The Network for Online Registration of Anaphylaxis (NORA)
Background Patients with a history of anaphylaxis are at risk of future anaphylactic reactions. Thus, secondary prevention measures are recommended for these patients to prevent or attenuate the next reaction. Methods Data from the Anaphylaxis Registry were analyzed to identify secondary prevention measures offered to patients who experienced anaphylaxis. Our analysis included 7788 cases from 10 European countries and Brazil. Results The secondary prevention measures offered varied across the elicitors. A remarkable discrepancy was observed between prevention measures offered in specialized allergy centers (84% of patients were prescribed adrenaline autoinjectors following EAACI guidelines) and outside the centers: Here, EAACI guideline adherence was only 37%. In the multivariate analysis, the elicitor of the reaction, age of the patient, mastocytosis as comorbidity, severity of the reaction, and reimbursement/availability of the autoinjector influence physician's decision to prescribe one. Conclusions Based on the low implementation of guidelines concerning secondary prevention measures outside of specialized allergy centers, our findings highlight the importance of these specialized centers and the requirement of better education for primary healthcare and emergency physicians.
Files in this item
Thumbnail
Secondary prevention measures in anaphylaxis patients Data from the anaphylaxis registry.pdf — Adobe PDF — 713.8 Kb
MD5: d2a212a13b8b8c8c54366708cc4ed152
Cite
BibTeX
EndNote
RIS
(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschland(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschland
Details
Terms of Use Imprint Policy Data Privacy Statement Contact

The Robert Koch Institute is a Federal Institute

within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health

© Robert Koch Institute

All rights reserved unless explicitly granted.

 
DOI
10.25646/6617
Permanent URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.25646/6617
HTML
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.25646/6617">http://dx.doi.org/10.25646/6617</a>