Show simple item record

2022-04-07Zeitschriftenartikel
Structured diabetes self-management education and its association with perceived diabetes knowledge, information, and disease distress: Results of a nationwide population-based study
dc.contributor.authorHeise, M.
dc.contributor.authorHeidemann, C.
dc.contributor.authorBaumert, J.
dc.contributor.authorDu, Y.
dc.contributor.authorFrese, T.
dc.contributor.authorAvetisyan, M.
dc.contributor.authorWeise, S.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-23T06:20:58Z
dc.date.available2022-05-23T06:20:58Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-07none
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.pcd.2022.03.016
dc.identifier.urihttp://edoc.rki.de/176904/9740
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate, how participation in structured diabetes self-management education (DSME) programs is associated with perceived level of knowledge about diabetes, information needs, information sources and disease distress. Methods: We included 796 ever- and 277 never-DSME participants of the population-based survey “Disease knowledge and information needs - Diabetes mellitus (2017)” from Germany. Data on perceived level of diabetes knowledge (12 items), information needs (11 items), information sources (13 items) and disease distress (2 indices) were collected. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association of DSME-participation with these outcomes. Results: DSME-participants showed a higher level of diabetes knowledge compared to never-DSME participants, particularly in aspects concerning diabetes in general (odds ratio 2.53; 95% confidence intervals 1.48–4.33), treatment (2.41; 1.36–4.26), acute complications (1.91; 1.07–3.41) and diabetes in everyday life (1.83; 1.04–3.22). DSME-participants showed higher information needs regarding late complications (1.51; 1.04–2.18) and acute complications (1.71; 1.71–2.48) than DSME never participants. DSME-participants more frequently consulted diabetologists (5.54; 3.56–8.60) and diabetes care specialists (5.62; 3.61–8.75) as information sources. DSME participation was not associated with disease distress. Conclusion: DSME is a valuable tool for improving individual knowledge about diabetes. However, DSME should focus more on psychosocial aspects to reduce the disease burden.eng
dc.language.isoengnone
dc.publisherRobert Koch-Institut
dc.rights(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschlandger
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/
dc.subjectStructured diabetes mellitus self-management educationeng
dc.subjectDiabetes mellituseng
dc.subjectPopulations-based studyeng
dc.subjectDiabetes knowledgeeng
dc.subjectDisease distresseng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin und Gesundheitnone
dc.titleStructured diabetes self-management education and its association with perceived diabetes knowledge, information, and disease distress: Results of a nationwide population-based studynone
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0257-176904/9740-3
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
local.edoc.container-titlePrimary Care Diabetesnone
local.edoc.container-issn1751-9918none
local.edoc.type-nameZeitschriftenartikel
local.edoc.container-typeperiodical
local.edoc.container-type-nameZeitschrift
local.edoc.container-urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751991822000778?via%3Dihubnone
local.edoc.container-publisher-nameElseviernone
local.edoc.container-volume16none
local.edoc.container-issue3none
local.edoc.container-year2022none
local.edoc.container-firstpage387none
local.edoc.container-lastpage394none

Show simple item record