Logo des Robert Koch-InstitutLogo des Robert Koch-Institut
Publikationsserver des Robert Koch-Institutsedoc
de|en
Publikation anzeigen 
  • edoc Startseite
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Journal of Health Monitoring
  • Publikation anzeigen
  • edoc Startseite
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Journal of Health Monitoring
  • Publikation anzeigen
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Gesamter edoc-ServerBereiche & SammlungenTitelAutorSchlagwortDiese SammlungTitelAutorSchlagwort
PublizierenEinloggenRegistrierenHilfe
StatistikNutzungsstatistik
Gesamter edoc-ServerBereiche & SammlungenTitelAutorSchlagwortDiese SammlungTitelAutorSchlagwort
PublizierenEinloggenRegistrierenHilfe
StatistikNutzungsstatistik
Publikation anzeigen 
  • edoc Startseite
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Journal of Health Monitoring
  • Publikation anzeigen
  • edoc Startseite
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Journal of Health Monitoring
  • Publikation anzeigen
2022-06-29Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.25646/9958
Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study – objectives, procedure and experiences
Pöge, Kathleen
Rommel, Alexander
Starker, Anne
Prütz, Franziska
Tolksdorf, Katharina
Öztürk, Ilter
Strasser, Sarah
Born, Sabine
Saß, Anke-Christine
Sex/gender diversity is increasingly recognised by society and should be taken into account more in populationrepresentative studies, as they are important data sources for targeting health promotion, prevention and care. In 2019, the Robert Koch Institute started a population-representative health survey with the study Health in Germany Update (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) with a modified, two-stage measures of sex/gender. The survey covered sex registered at birth and gender identity with an open response option. This article describes the aims, the procedure and the experiences with the operationalisation of sex/gender and the results. Out of 23,001 respondents, 22,826 persons are classified as cisgender, 113 persons as transgender and 29 persons as gender-diverse. 33 respondents were counted as having missing values. A survey of interviewers showed that the two-stage measures of sex/gender had a high level of acceptance overall and that there were only a few interview drop-outs. On the basis of previous experience, the modified query can be used for further surveys, but should also be adapted in perspective. For this purpose, participatory studies are desirable that focus on how the acceptance of measures of sex/gender can be further improved and how hurtful experiences in the context of the questions asked can be avoided.
Dateien zu dieser Publikation
Thumbnail
JHealthMonit_2022_02_Gender_diversity.pdf — PDF — 251.6 Kb
MD5: 780fb9c16ea85dd52c813986fb003461
Zitieren
BibTeX
EndNote
RIS
(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschland(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschland
Zur Langanzeige
Nutzungsbedingungen Impressum Leitlinien Datenschutzerklärung Kontakt

Das Robert Koch-Institut ist ein Bundesinstitut im

Geschäftsbereich des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit

© Robert Koch Institut

Alle Rechte vorbehalten, soweit nicht ausdrücklich anders vermerkt.

 
DOI
10.25646/9958
Permanent URL
https://doi.org/10.25646/9958
HTML
<a href="https://doi.org/10.25646/9958">https://doi.org/10.25646/9958</a>