2021-12-22Zeitschriftenartikel
Overview of national health reporting in the EU and quality criteria for public health reports – results of the Joint Action InfAct
Thissen, Martin
Seeling, Stefanie
Achterberg, Peter
Fehr, Angela
Palmieri, Luigi
Tijhuis, Mariken J.
Unim, Brigid
Ziese, Thomas
Background
Health reporting shall provide up-to-date health-related data to inform policy-makers, researchers and the public. To this end, health reporting formats should be tailored to the needs and competencies of the target groups and provide comparable and high-quality information. Within the Joint Action on Health Information ‘InfAct’, we aimed at gaining an overview of health reporting practices in the EU Member States and associated countries, and developed quality criteria for the preparation of public health reports. The results are intended to facilitate making health information adequately available while reducing inequalities in health reporting across the EU.
Methods
A web-based desk research was conducted among EU Member States and associated countries to generate an overview of different formats of national health reporting and their respective target groups. To identify possible quality criteria for public health reports, an exploratory literature review was performed and earlier projects were analysed. The final set of criteria was developed in exchange with experts from the InfAct consortium.
Results
The web-based desk research showed that public health reports are the most frequently used format across countries (94%), most often addressed to scientists and researchers (51%), politicians and decision-makers (41%). However, across all reporting formats, the general public is the most frequently addressed target group. With regards to quality criteria for public health reports, the literature review has yielded few results. Therefore, two earlier projects served as main sources: the ‘Evaluation of National and Regional Public Health Reports’ and the guideline ‘Good Practice in Health Reporting‘from Germany. In collaboration with experts, quality criteria were identified and grouped into eight categories, ranging from topic selection to presentation of results, and compiled in a checklist for easy reference.
Conclusion
Health reporting practices in the EU are heterogeneous across Member States. The assembled quality criteria are intended to facilitate the preparation, dissemination and access to better comparable high-quality public health reports as a basis for evidence-based decision-making. A comprehensive conceptual and integrative approach that incorporates the policy perspective would be useful to investigate which dissemination strategies are the most suitable for specific requirements of the targeted groups.
Related Items
Show related Items with similar Title, Author, Creator or Subject.
-
2008-08-29Berichte und sonstige TexteReport: "Health in Germany" Robert Koch-InstitutLife expectancy is rising and the general health situation is good, but the number of people who smoke, are too fat, take too little exercise and/or drink too much alcohol is still too high. These are the main conclusions ...
-
2009-08-26ZeitschriftenartikelMeasuring adolescents' HRQoL via self reports and parent proxy reports: an evaluation of the psychometric properties of both versions of the KINDL-R instrument Erhart, Michael; Ellert, Ute; Kurth, Bärbel-Maria; Ravens-Sieberer, UlrikeBackground: Several instruments are available to assess children's health-related quality of life (HRQoL) based on self reports as well as proxy reports from parents. Previous studies have found only low-to-moderate ...
-
2022-01-11ZeitschriftenartikelPrioritizing health information for national health reporting - a Delphi study of the Joint Action on Health Information (InfAct) Fehr, Angela; Seeling, Stefanie; Hornbacher, Anselm; Thißen, Martin; Bogaert, Petronille; Delnord, Marie; Lyons, Ronan A.; Tijhuis, Mariken J.; Achterberg, Peter; Ziese, ThomasBackground Health information (HI) strategies exist in several EU Member States, however, they mainly focus on technical issues and improving governance rather than on content-related priority setting. There is also ...