Logo des Robert Koch-InstitutLogo des Robert Koch-Institut
Publikationsserver des Robert Koch-Institutsedoc
de|en
Publikation anzeigen 
  • edoc Startseite
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Journal of Health Monitoring
  • Publikation anzeigen
  • edoc Startseite
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Journal of Health Monitoring
  • Publikation anzeigen
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Gesamter edoc-ServerBereiche & SammlungenTitelAutorSchlagwortDiese SammlungTitelAutorSchlagwort
PublizierenEinloggenRegistrierenHilfe
StatistikNutzungsstatistik
Gesamter edoc-ServerBereiche & SammlungenTitelAutorSchlagwortDiese SammlungTitelAutorSchlagwort
PublizierenEinloggenRegistrierenHilfe
StatistikNutzungsstatistik
Publikation anzeigen 
  • edoc Startseite
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Journal of Health Monitoring
  • Publikation anzeigen
  • edoc Startseite
  • Artikel in Fachzeitschriften
  • Journal of Health Monitoring
  • Publikation anzeigen
2026-11-04Zeitschriftenartikel DOI: 10.25646/14469
What Is There to Gain? A Systematic Review on Psychosocial Co-Benefits of Climate Policies
Kip, Ahlke
Tschorn, Mira
Vogel, Susanne
Birtel, Michèle D.
Hendricks, Carla L.
Voigt, Anne
Rooß, Silas
Asbrand, Julia
Background: Climate change poses major risks to psychosocial health, yet little is known about potential psychosocial co-benefits of climate policies. This systematic review examines (A) psychosocial co-benefits associated with climate policy measures and (B) moderating factors shaping these effects. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, k = 21 studies were identified and analysed using a PICOS framework and narrative synthesis. Results: Climate policies, particularly air pollution control, environmental taxation, and nature-based urban interventions, were associated with improvements in subjective well-being, mental health, and social cohesion. Effects were moderated by environmental improvements and physical health gains, and varied by socioeconomic status, age, and contexts such as schools or rural vs. urban locations. Access to and actual use of interventions emerged as relevant but understudied mechanisms. Some studies indicated trade-offs, including unequal distribution of benefits and unintended social effects. Conclusions: Overall, climate policies can generate psychosocial co-benefits, but evidence remains heterogeneous and methodologically limited. Future research should strengthen causal inference, standardise outcome measures, and examine long-term and distributional effects.
Dateien zu dieser Publikation
Thumbnail
johm-11-22-pdf.pdf — PDF — 423.6 Kb
MD5: 03652b88445276fa79ef7651c03c23a5
Zitieren
BibTeX
EndNote
RIS
(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschland(CC BY 3.0 DE) Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschland
Zur Langanzeige
Nutzungsbedingungen Impressum Leitlinien Datenschutzerklärung Kontakt

Das Robert Koch-Institut ist ein Bundesinstitut im

Geschäftsbereich des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit

© Robert Koch Institut

Alle Rechte vorbehalten, soweit nicht ausdrücklich anders vermerkt.

 
DOI
10.25646/14469
Permanent URL
https://doi.org/10.25646/14469
HTML
<a href="https://doi.org/10.25646/14469">https://doi.org/10.25646/14469</a>